Purpose & Legislative Background
TasCollege acknowledges that assessment is a central service offered to students and is a core element of its operations as a Registered Training Organisation (RTO). This policy is aligned with the legislative requirements outlined in:
- Clauses 1.8-1.13 of Standard 1, Standards for RTOs 2015:
Ensures the assessment process measures students’ skills and knowledge against nationally endorsed Training Packages or accredited courses. - Standard 2, National Code of Practice for Providers of Education and Training to Overseas Students 2018:
Outlines the principles of Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL).
TasCollege commits to delivering high-quality assessments by adhering to the following determinants:
- Alignment with Units of Competency:
Assessment decisions are based on the knowledge and skills specified in nationally endorsed Training Packages or accredited courses. - Industry Contextualization:
Assessment integrates industry and enterprise-specific requirements. - Rules of Evidence Compliance:
Evidence collected adheres to sufficiency, authenticity, validity, and currency standards. - Principles of Assessment Compliance:
Assessment meets validity, reliability, flexibility, and fairness requirements.
Scope
Assessment of Units of Competency
TasCollege bases its assessments on the requirements outlined in nationally endorsed Training Packages, supplemented as needed by industry standards and codes of practice. To ensure validity:
- Units of competency are thoroughly “unpacked” to assess their full scope, including elements, performance evidence, knowledge evidence, and required conditions.
- Assessment tools and strategies are mapped to unit requirements during design, development, and validation processes.
- Comprehensive unit mapping demonstrates the relationship between assessment activities and unit components at a granular level, ensuring assessments meet training package requirements.
Assessment Context
TasCollege establishes appropriate contexts for assessments to simulate realistic workplace environments while ensuring the transferability of skills and knowledge across industries. Strategies include:
- Incorporating workplace policies, procedures, and industry standards into assessments.
- Developing realistic scenarios, case studies, and simulated environments within TasCollege facilities.
- Tailoring training outcomes to meet enterprise-specific needs while maintaining compliance with training package standards.
Transferability of competency remains paramount, ensuring students can apply skills and knowledge across different workplaces.
Principles of Assessment
TasCollege ensures that its assessment practices adhere to the following Principles of Assessment:
- Validity
- Assessment reflects the skills and knowledge specified in the unit of competency.
- It incorporates the performance of workplace tasks, ensuring transferability and alignment with all unit components.
- Reliability
- Assessors apply consistent methodologies and standardised resources, including model answers, to ensure uniform assessment outcomes.
- Regular moderation of assessments enhances reliability.
- Flexibility
- Assessment strategies are adaptable to student needs, accommodating recognition of prior learning and varied delivery methods.
- Fairness
- Assessments are designed to consider individual student needs, and reasonable adjustments are made without compromising outcomes.
- Clear communication ensures students understand and agree with the assessment process.
Rules of Evidence
TasCollege ensures compliance with the Rules of Evidence when collecting evidence:
- Sufficiency
- Evidence collected demonstrates all aspects of competency and allows repeated demonstration of skills.
- Validity
- Evidence aligns directly with unit requirements and replicates workplace tasks.
- Authenticity
- Evidence must be the student’s own work, verified through signed authenticity statements or additional supporting evidence.
- Currency
- Evidence reflects the student’s current skills and knowledge, particularly for RPL applications.
Engagement with Industry
TasCollege integrates industry requirements into assessments through consultation with enterprises and regulatory bodies. Industry engagement ensures that assessments reflect workplace expectations and prepare students for industry-specific duties.
TasCollege: Assessment Integrity Check Arrangement
TasCollege will ensure all assessment are deemed competent. The Academic manager will review a sample for assessment and allocate it to different trainer to evaluate the integrity and quality of the assessment.
Any assessment found not marked competently will go through the validation process as per the judgement of the academic manager.
Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL)
RPL is offered as a method of assessment to recognise students’ existing competencies. It adheres to this policy and follows TasCollege’s RPL procedures.
Credit Transfer
TasCollege recognises completed units of competency from other RTOs. Credit transfer is an administrative process distinct from assessment and requires documented evidence of equivalence.
Competence of Assessors
Assessors must meet the following requirements:
- Hold the requisite training and assessment qualifications.
- Possess vocational competencies at least to the level being assessed.
- Engage in ongoing professional development to maintain competency.
Where assessors lack training and assessment competencies but are industry experts, supervision arrangements are implemented.
Assessment Process
The following procedural steps guide assessments at TasCollege:
Step 1: Prepare for Assessment
Assessors must:
- Establish the purpose and context of the assessment.
- Analyse units of competency and evidence requirements.
- Confirm the adequacy and currency of assessment tools.
Step 2: Prepare the Student
Assessors meet with students to:
- Explain the assessment process and evidence requirements.
- Address reasonable adjustments for disabilities.
- Determine readiness for assessment and schedule accordingly.
Step 3: Plan and Prepare Evidence Gathering
Assessors develop a plan to;
- Gather sufficient evidence, prepare necessary materials
- Coordinate personnel and resources.
Step 4: Collect Evidence and Make the Assessment Decision
Assessors:
- Collect evidence aligned with unit requirements.
- Evaluate evidence for validity, sufficiency, authenticity, and currency.
- Record evidence and make competency decisions.
Step 5: Provide Feedback
Students receive constructive feedback, information on addressing competency gaps, and guidance on reassessment or appeals.
Step 6: Record and Report Results
Assessors:
- Document outcomes and maintain confidentiality.
- Issue statements of attainment in accordance with TasCollege procedures.
Step 7: Review the Assessment Process
Assessors review the process and suggest improvements via Continuous Improvement Reports or validation activities.
Step 8: Participate in Reassessment and Appeals
Assessors provide feedback on appeals and support students through the reassessment process if required.
Assessments must be submitted within 7 days of the Unit Delivery completion date
Procedure | Details | Responsibility |
Resubmission | – Resubmission of assessment is applicable only after an assessment has been marked Unsatisfactory. | Trainer and Assessor |
| – Students are allowed up to 3 attempts per assessment. After each unsatisfactory attempt, assessors provide detailed, constructive feedback to guide improvement. | Trainer and Assessor |
| – Resubmission must be completed within 7 days of receiving feedback. | Trainer and Assessor |
| – If a student is assessed as Unsatisfactory after all 3 attempts, they will be deemed as having Not Yet Competent (NYC) in that unit; unless the student requests Reassessment and is approved by the Academic Manager/Academic Team. | Trainer and Assessor, Academic Manager |
Reassessment | – Students who fail resubmission or do not qualify for it will undergo the reassessment process. | Trainer and Assessor; Academic Manager |
| – To qualify for reassessment, students must have completed and submitted all required assessments for the unit of competency per the unit assessment schedule. Students must submit a completed Reassessment Request Form available on aXcelerate and reception; to apply for reassessment. | Trainer and Assessor, Academic Manager |
| – Students are given 3 reassessment attempts. Reassessments only apply to specific assessment tasks where students were deemed Unsatisfactory. | Trainer and Assessor |
| – Students can attempt an additional 3 reassessments, for a total of 6 attempts. | Trainer and Assessor |
| – The first reassessment attempt must occur within 2 weeks of reassessment confirmation. Subsequent resubmissions must be completed within 7 days of receiving feedback. | Trainer and Assessor |
| – If all reassessment attempts are deemed Unsatisfactory, students will be marked as Not Yet Competent (NYC) in that unit. | Trainer and Assessor |
Resit (or Repeat) | – If students are not eligible for resubmission/reassessment or remain in NYC after reassessment, they must re-sit the unit in the next term or semester. Re-sit means to repeat the entire Unit of Competency. | Academic Manager |
| – This may result in a course duration extension, which could affect the student’s original course completion date. | Academic Manager |
| – Students must pay a pro-rata fee of the course fee for the re-sit. | Student; Academic Manager |
| – The Academic Team to issue a special training plan and an invoice for the re-sit attempt. | Academic Manager |
| – At this stage, students will be informed if the Confirmation of Enrolment (CoE) requires amendment. | Academic Manager, PRISMS Officer |
Late Submission Fee | A Late Submission Fee per assessment task may apply if students fail to submit assessments by the due date. The due date for each assessment is available on aXcelerate and email notifications are sent 7 days prior and 1 day prior the due date. | Academic Support Officer, Accounts Officer |
Appeals | A student may appeal against a decision by completing and submitting the Complaints and Appeals Form available on aXcelerate and on the website. | Academic Manager |
Associated Documents
- Industry Engagement Policy
- Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL) & Credit Transfer (CT) Policy
- Trainer & Assessor Recruitment Policy
- Validation Policy
- Continuous Improvement Policy
- Course Progress Policy and Procedure
- Complaints and Appeals Form
Version Control
Version | Date | Changes / Updates | Approved |
4.1 | December 2024 | Mapping with TasCollege Internal Procedures and Documents | QAC |
4.0 | September 2024 | Complete Review of the Policy to map with Operations and updated against latest Legislative Instruments | QAC |
3.0 | March 2024 | Complete Review of the Policy to map with Operations and updated against latest Legislative Instruments | QAC |
Next Review Date: December 2027